India’s transition from colonial governance to a sovereign republic demanded a smooth shift in legislative structure . To prevent disruption in governance several transitional provisions were added to the Constitution . Among them was Article 382 of Indian Constitution under part XXI which played a crucial role in bridging pre- and post-Constitution legislative arrangements.

This article applied to states in Part A of the First Schedule and allowed their provisional legislatures to continue functioning until new assemblies were formed . Without this safeguard administrative paralysis would have been a serious risk . By ensuring continuity of legislative authority, article 382 supported India's legal and political stability at a defining moment.

Though Article 382 of Constitution of India was eventually omitted, it exemplifies the thoughtful design of transitional provisions. It ensured that legislative assemblies already in place could operate under the new Constitution until they were reconstituted through elections. Explore in-depth analysis of other Constitutional Articles.

Article 382 of Indian Constitution

Provisions as to provisional Legislatures for States in Part A of the First Schedule

Omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).

(1) Until the House or Houses of the Legislature of each State specified in Part A of the First Schedule has or have been duly constituted and summoned to meet for the first session under the provisions of this Constitution, the House or Houses of the Legislature of the corresponding Province functioning immediately before the commencement of this Constitution shall exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred by the provisions of this Constitution on the House or Houses of the Legislature of such State.

(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (1), where a general election to reconstitute the Legislative Assembly of a Province has been ordered before the commencement of this Constitution, the election may be completed after such commencement as if this Constitution had not come into operation, and the Assembly so reconstituted shall be deemed to be the Legislative Assembly of that Province for the purposes of that clause.

(3) Any person holding office immediately before the commencement of this Constitution as Speaker or Deputy Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or President or Deputy President of the Legislative Council of a Province shall on such commencement be the Speaker or Deputy Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or the Chairman or Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council, as the case may be, of the corresponding State specified in Part A of the First Schedule while such Assembly or Council functions under clause (1):

Provided that where a general election has been ordered for the reconstitution of the Legislative Assembly of a Province before the commencement of this Constitution and the first meeting of the Assembly as so reconstituted is held after such commencement, the provisions of this clause shall not apply and the Assembly as reconstituted shall elect two members of the Assembly to be respectively the Speaker and Deputy Speaker thereof.

Note: "The information provided above has been sourced from the official website, i.e., Indian Code. While the content has been presented here for reference, no modifications have been made to the original laws and orders" 

Free Download PDF on Article 382 of Indian Constitution

Article 382 of the Indian Constitution as it originally existed aimed to ensure continuity by allowing the provisional legislatures of states listed in Part A of the First Schedule to continue functioning until duly elected legislatures were formed. This meant assemblies and councils from the colonial era, governed by the Government of India Act, 1935, would not suddenly dissolve .

The article outlined that individuals holding positions such as Speaker or Deputy Speaker before the Constitution’s commencement would automatically continue in those roles in the state legislature . This prevented the need for immediate elections and allowed states to transition smoothly into the new constitutional order .

However a proviso was included. If a general election had already been ordered for reconstituting the assembly before the Constitution came into force, and the new legislature met after that date, then it would elect its own Speaker and Deputy Speaker. In that case, the automatic transition under article 382 would not apply.

Thus, Article 382 of Constitution of India guaranteed institutional stability while giving newly elected bodies democratic control over their leadership. This dual functionality of 382 article shows the framers’ foresight in dealing with transitional complexities.

Elaborating the Functioning of Article 382

To better appreciate the functioning of Article 382 of the Indian Constitution, let us break down its four essential components:

The following subpoints explain how art 382 worked on the ground:

1. Provisional Legislatures

Article 382 addressed the status of legislatures that existed before the Constitution took effect . These bodies were labeled “provisional” and were intended to be replaced by state legislatures formed under the Constitution .

2 . Automatic Transitions

Those already serving as Speaker or Deputy Speaker in these provisional assemblies would retain their positions in the corresponding new legislatures . This automatic transition ensured governance didn’t pause during the switch.

3. Elections and New Speakers

There was an important condition: if general elections had been held before the Constitution began, and the first meeting of the new legislature occurred afterward, then that assembly would elect its Speaker and Deputy Speaker—rendering the automatic continuity clause inapplicable.

4. Omission of Article 382

Once India’s state legislative structures were fully functional, Article 382 of Constitution became redundant. It was officially omitted through the Seventh Amendment Act, 1956, marking the end of its utility.

Article 382 of Indian Constitution Landmark Judgments

Although Article 382 of the Indian Constitution was transitional, it featured in several legal judgments during India’s formative years:

1. A. Nesamony v. T.M. Varghese (1950)

In this case, the Kerala High Court addressed whether the Speaker of the Travancore-Cochin Legislative Assembly, who was in office before the Constitution came into force, could continue in that role afterward. The court directly applied Article 382 of the Indian Constitution, which allowed individuals holding the office of Speaker or Deputy Speaker in provisional legislatures to automatically continue in their posts in the corresponding state legislatures, provided no new elections had been held. The judgment upheld the continuity of office based on Article 382, making this a key case directly interpreting the article.

2. Anand Bihari Mishra v. Ram Sahay (1951)

The Madhya Pradesh High Court examined the status of the President of the Interim Legislative Assembly of Madhya Bharat after the Constitution's commencement. While Article 385 applied to that region, the court explicitly contrasted it with Article 382 of Constitution of India, which allowed continuity of officeholders in Part A states. The court explained that unlike Article 385, which made no such provision, Article 382 specifically protected the continuity of Speakers and Deputy Speakers in provisional assemblies. This judgment clearly interprets and applies Article 382, making it strictly relevant.

Each of these cases shows how 382 article was essential in upholding legislative authority during uncertain times.

Article 382 of Indian Constitution Significance

The historical importance of Article 382 of the Indian Constitution lies in how it upheld legislative continuity during India’s transition into a full fledged republic . At a time when constitutional institutions were still being constructed this article maintained the validity and functionality of existing assemblies .

By allowing pre-Constitution bodies to operate temporarily, article 382 avoided administrative voids . It ensured lawmaking and governance could continue uninterrupted until elections were conducted and new assemblies took charge .

More than just a temporary clause Article 382 of Constitution highlighted the Constitution's adaptability. It preserved legal order while enabling the formation of democratically elected bodies—without either dominating the other.

This flexibility shows why Article 382 of Constitution of India is still studied today as a model of how transitional provisions can stabilize governance in post-colonial nations.

Article 382 of Indian Constitution Developments and Amendments

As India’s constitutional framework matured, provisional clauses like Article 382 of the Indian Constitution were phased out. By 1956, every Part A state had functioning legislative assemblies under the Constitution.

Thus, article 382 had served its purpose. It was omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956. This amendment not only removed 382 article but also restructured India’s state classification. It eliminated the distinctions between Part A, B and C states, offering a more uniform federal structure .

The amendment symbolized India’s growing political maturity and administrative clarity . Transitional tools were now redundant, and the Constitution could rely on its permanent machinery.

The omission of art 382 represents a successful transition from temporary solutions to permanent governance. Although it no longer exists, its contribution to state formation and constitutional stability is remembered through judicial references and academic study.

Conclusion

Article 382 of the Indian Constitution might be omitted, but its legacy is profound. It ensured continuity, preserved legislative function, and protected India from a governance vacuum in 1950.

This article allowed provisional legislatures to operate under the new constitutional scheme until fresh elections could be held. The clause about automatic transitions of Speakers added administrative ease, while the proviso upheld democratic principles.

Its removal in 1956 wasn’t a sign of failure, but of fulfilled purpose. The Indian constitutional framework had evolved to a point where such provisions were no longer needed. That’s why Article 382 of Constitution is often studied not for what it did permanently, but how it helped build what came next.

By analyzing Article 382 of Constitution of India, we understand the importance of transitional mechanisms in constitution-building. These silent clauses make all the difference in holding together the framework of a new republic.

Even as article 382 fades from current law books, its imprint on India's democratic history remains firm and instructive.