Article 215 of Indian Constitution- Detailed Analysis
IMPORTANT LINKS
Part 6 of the Indian Constitution
|
Overview |
|
|
Name of the Article |
Article 215 of Indian Constitution- High Courts to be courts of record |
|
Part of the Constitutional Article |
Part VI |
Under Part VI of the Constitution, Article 215 of Indian Constitution designates every High Court as a court of record, endowing it with all associated powers, including the authority to punish for contempt of itself. This article highlights the freedom and authority of High Courts within the judicial structure of India, ensuring they maintain their dignity and the effective administration of justice.
Background of Article 215 of Indian Constitution
Common law traditions introduced "court of record." Historically courts of record maintained permanent records that served as unquestionable evidence in legal proceedings. Article 215 integrates this principle by granting High Courts inherent authority to keep official records along with the power to enforce their authority through contempt penalties. This provision aligns with Article 129, which confers similar status and powers upon the Supreme Court of India. Explore in-depth analysis of other Constitutional Articles.
Interpretation of Article 215 of Indian Constitution
Article 215 reads: "Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself." This can be interpreted as :
- Court of Record: High Courts have the authority to maintain permanent records of their proceedings. These records are conclusive evidence of the matters adjudicated, and their veracity cannot be challenged in any subordinate court.
- Power to Punish for Contempt: High Courts possess the inherent authority to punish individuals or entities that act in contempt of the court. Contempt can be categorized into:
- Civil Contempt: Willful disobedience of any judgment, decree, direction, order, writ, or other process of the court.
- Criminal Contempt: Acts that scandalize or lower the authority of the court, prejudice judicial proceedings, or obstruct the administration of justice.
This power is vital for maintaining the dignity, authority, and proper functioning of the judiciary.
Landmark Cases or Judgments of Article 215 of Indian Constitution
Under Indian Constitution, several landmark judgments have elucidated the scope and significance of Article 215:
- Prashant Bhushan Contempt Case (2020): The Supreme Court held advocate Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt for his tweets criticizing the judiciary. This case highlighted the judiciary's sensitivity to preserving its dignity and the boundaries of free speech concerning judicial criticism.
- Vitusah Oberoi v. Court of Its Own Motion (2017): The Supreme Court clarified that while High Courts have the power to punish for contempt under Article 215, this power does not extend to punishing for contempt of the Supreme Court. The Court emphasized that such authority has never been recognized as an attribute of a court of record nor specifically conferred upon High Courts under Article 215.
Significance of Article 215 of Indian Constitution
Article 215 plays a pivotal role in the Indian judicial system:
- Judicial Independence: The High Courts are empowered to act as courts of record with powers of contempt which ensures they can operate without external interference and by preserving their independence.
- Authority and Dignity: The ability to punish for contempt protects the authority and dignity of the courts by ensuring that their orders are respected and properly followed.
Efficient Justice Delivery: By maintaining comprehensive records and having the authority to enforce their rulings, High Courts can function more effectively, ensuring timely justice.
Developments and Amendments of Article 215 of Indian Constitution
Since its inception, Article 215 has remained unchanged. However, its application has evolved through judicial interpretations:
- Contempt Jurisprudence: Courts have refined the definition and scope of contempt, balancing the need to uphold judicial authority with the fundamental right to free speech.
- Judicial Accountability: Courts hold contempt powers but ongoing discussions focus on making sure these powers are applied with judicial care so they do not suppress beneficial criticism.
Conclusion
Article 215 of Indian Constitution serves as the basis for High Courts to act as courts of record and has the inherent contempt powers. The provision enables High Courts to exercise their authority and maintain the rule of law while operating effectively in India's democratic system. The authority to enforce contempt penalties remains essential but should be applied cautiously to maintain judicial respect while protecting personal rights.
FAQs on Article 215 of Indian Constitution
What is Article 215 of Indian Constitution?
It designates every High Court as a court of record with the power to punish for contempt of itself.
What does being a "court of record" mean under Article 215?
It means High Courts can maintain permanent records of proceedings, which serve as authoritative evidence and cannot be questioned in subordinate courts.
What is the scope of the contempt power under Article 215 of Indian Constitution?
High Courts can penalize actions that disrespect their authority or obstruct justice, ensuring the enforcement of their orders.
Is there a time limit to initiate contempt proceedings under Article 215?
Yes within 1 year from the alleged contempt according to Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Can High Courts exercise contempt powers beyond the one-year limitation under Article 215 of Indian Constitution?
In exceptional circumstances, High Courts may exercise contempt powers beyond the one-year limit to address significant injustices or matters of public importance.