Consider the following statements regarding the appointment of ad-hoc judges:

1. Ad-hoc judges in High Courts are appointed under Article 224-A of the Constitution to address judicial backlogs, as reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in the Lok Prahari (2021) judgment.

2. Article 224-A allows ad-hoc judges to be appointed with the consent of the retired judge and the Chief Justice of India.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. 1 only
  2. 2 only
  3. Both 1 and 2
  4. Neither 1 nor 2

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 1 : 1 only

Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF

The correct answer is option 1

In News

  • On January 30, 2024, the Supreme Court allowed High Courts to appoint ad-hoc judges under Article 224-A to tackle the increasing backlog of cases. The Court relaxed certain restrictions from the Lok Prahari (2021) judgment, allowing ad-hoc judges to hear only criminal appeals as part of a Bench led by a sitting judge. However, the Union Law Ministry has yet to receive proposals from High Courts for such appointments.

Key Points

  • Article 224-A of the Constitution enables the appointment of retired judges as ad-hoc judges in High Courts to reduce judicial backlogs. The Supreme Court’s Lok Prahari (2021) judgment reaffirmed their importance in addressing rising pendency. Hence, Statement 1 is correct.
  • Article 224-A states that the Chief Justice of a High Court may request a retired judge to serve as an ad-hoc judge, but this requires the prior consent of the President of India, not just the Chief Justice of India (CJI). Hence, Statement 2 is incorrect.

Additional Information

  • Process of Appointment:
    • The Chief Justice of a High Court initiates the appointment request.
    • The President of India must give prior consent before an ad-hoc judge can be appointed.
    • The retired judge must also provide consent before assuming the role.
  • Conditions set by the Supreme Court (2024 ruling) for ad-hoc judges:
    • They can only hear criminal appeals.
    • Their number cannot exceed 10% of a High Court’s sanctioned strength.
    • They must work as part of a Bench led by a sitting judge.
  • Historical Precedents of Ad-hoc Appointments:
    • 1972: Justice Suraj Bhan (Madhya Pradesh High Court).
    • 1982: Justice P. Venugopal (Madras High Court).
    • 2007: Justice O.P. Srivastava (Allahabad High Court – Ayodhya Title Case).

More Polity Questions

Get Free Access Now
Hot Links: teen patti all games teen patti master 2024 teen patti classic teen patti master online