Structural Change MCQ Quiz - Objective Question with Answer for Structural Change - Download Free PDF
Last updated on Apr 28, 2025
Latest Structural Change MCQ Objective Questions
Structural Change Question 1:
What is a key characteristic that distinguishes industrial societies from traditional civilizations?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 1 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is - Industrial societies rely more on inanimate power sources and machines.
Key Points
- Industrial societies are characterized by the use of machines and inanimate power sources, such as steam and electricity.
- Unlike traditional civilizations, where most labor was manual and based on human or animal power, industrial societies mechanized production.
- This shift enabled mass production, increased efficiency, and the expansion of industries like manufacturing, transportation, and communication.
- Urbanization and employment shifts
- As industrialization progressed, employment shifted away from agriculture to industries, offices, and service sectors.
- In industrial societies, the majority of the workforce is engaged in non-agricultural sectors, such as technology, finance, and commerce.
Additional Information
- Traditional civilizations
- These societies were largely agrarian, with a majority of people working in farming and handicrafts.
- Technological advancements were relatively slow, leading to a dependency on manual labor.
- Impact of Industrialization
- Industrialization led to rapid urbanization, with cities expanding to accommodate factory workers and new industries.
- It also caused significant social and economic transformations, including the decline of traditional village economies.
- Contrast with Post-Industrial Societies
- While industrial societies rely on factories and mechanized production, post-industrial societies focus on services, knowledge, and technology.
- Post-industrial economies see a rise in employment in IT, finance, healthcare, and education.
Structural Change Question 2:
Which of the following best illustrates the paradox of colonialism in India?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 2 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is - Indians lived under colonial rule while learning about western liberalism and freedom
Key Points
- Paradox of Colonialism
- Colonial rule introduced modern ideas such as liberalism and freedom while simultaneously denying these rights to Indians.
- British education policies spread Western knowledge, but political rights remained restricted.
- This contradiction led to the rise of nationalist movements that demanded self-governance.
Additional Information
- Impact on Indian Society
- Western education led to the formation of an Indian intelligentsia that played a crucial role in political awakening.
- English language became a tool for both oppression and empowerment, creating opportunities but also social divisions.
- Examples of the Colonial Paradox
- While British rule introduced modern legal systems, it denied Indians participation in governance.
- The British promoted railways and industries, but mainly to benefit their own economy.
Structural Change Question 3:
Why is the colonial experience particularly significant for understanding modern India?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 3 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is - Because it brought modern ideas and institutions, but in a contradictory manner
Key Points
- Contradictory Nature of Colonialism
- Colonialism introduced modern ideas such as democracy, liberalism, and individual rights.
- However, these ideas were not applied to Indians, as they lived under oppressive colonial rule.
- Western Influences
- India adopted British-style governance, including a parliamentary system, legal codes, and policing.
- Western education introduced ideas of equality and rights, fueling nationalist movements.
- Impact on Social and Cultural Life
- Colonialism altered traditional Indian institutions but did not completely erase them.
- It led to a mix of traditional and modern elements in Indian society, influencing urbanization and industrialization.
Additional Information
- Economic Impact
- British policies led to deindustrialization and the decline of traditional Indian industries.
- However, they also established modern industries and railways, transforming India's economic landscape.
- English Language and Education
- English became a major language in India, providing access to global knowledge but also creating social inequalities.
- It benefited some marginalized groups, like the Dalits, by offering new opportunities in education and jobs.
- Political Awakening and Nationalism
- Exposure to western political thought led to the rise of Indian nationalism and the demand for self-rule.
- Movements like the Indian National Congress and Gandhian movements were influenced by these ideas.
Structural Change Question 4:
According to historian Sumit Sarkar, what initially affected urban luxury manufactures like Dacca’s silk?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 4 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is - Collapse of indigeneous court demand and external markets
Key Points
- Urban luxury manufactures like Dacca’s silk and cottons were among the finest exports of pre-colonial India.
- According to Sumit Sarkar (1983), these industries were hit first due to the simultaneous collapse of two key markets:
- Indigenous court demand – As regional kingdoms declined and princely states lost autonomy, court patronage for fine crafts diminished.
- External market – British colonial control redirected trade routes and policies to favour British manufactured goods, drastically reducing exports of Indian luxury textiles.
- This marked the beginning of deindustrialisation in eastern urban centres like Murshidabad and Dacca.
Additional Information
- Regional impact of British policies
- British penetration was earliest and deepest in eastern India, where courtly traditions were strongest, thus the decline was most visible there.
- Village crafts in interior regions survived longer but were later affected with the spread of railways and market integration.
- Shift in trade dynamics
- Under the East India Company, Manchester cloth flooded Indian markets, replacing handwoven Indian textiles.
- British export policies led to India becoming a supplier of raw materials rather than finished goods.
- Decline of artisan classes
- Craftsmen and weavers dependent on urban luxury markets either moved to subsistence agriculture or became wage labourers in emerging towns like Bombay and Madras.
- This had a long-term effect on social structures and occupational hierarchies in colonial India.
Structural Change Question 5:
In India, what was one of the initial consequences of British industrialisation?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 5 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is - Shift of people into agriculture
Key Points
- Initial impact of British industrialisation in India
- Unlike Britain, where industrialisation led to urbanisation, India saw a reverse trend in the early stages of colonial rule.
- Instead of urban migration, British policies and competition from Manchester textiles led to a decline in indigenous industries, pushing displaced artisans and craftsmen back into agriculture.
- The Census of India reports confirmed this demographic shift, with a growing population engaged in agriculture during the colonial period.
- This was a contradictory consequence of colonialism, where industrialisation did not follow the same trajectory as in the West.
Additional Information
- Deindustrialisation in colonial India
- Traditional urban centres like Surat, Dhaka, and Murshidabad declined due to loss of patronage and foreign competition.
- Exports of high-quality cotton and silk from India collapsed under pressure from British machine-made textiles.
- According to Sarkar (1983), the decline in demand from indigenous courts and external markets hurt urban luxury production first.
- Urbanisation in Britain vs India
- In Britain, industrialisation led to over 74% of the population living in towns by 1900, with London reaching a population of over 7 million (Giddens, 2001).
- In India, this urban trend was absent in the early phase; instead, there was a rise in agrarian dependence and stagnant industrial growth.
- Failed substitutes by the British
- The British offered land ownership and English education as alternatives to dislocated artisans.
- These failed to produce a vibrant middle class; instead, they led to zamindari parasitism and unemployed graduates (Mukherjee, 1979).
Top Structural Change MCQ Objective Questions
Who proposed the convergence thesis?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 6 Detailed Solution
Download Solution PDFThe correct answer is - Clark Kerr
Key Points
- Clark Kerr and the Convergence Thesis
- The convergence thesis was proposed by Clark Kerr, a modernization theorist and economist.
- It suggests that industrialized societies become more similar over time due to shared technological and economic advancements.
- According to Kerr, an industrialized 21st-century India shares more features with modern China or the United States than with 19th-century India.
- Core Idea of the Convergence Thesis
- As nations modernize and industrialize, their economic and social structures start resembling those of other developed nations.
- Key factors driving convergence include technological advancements, urbanization, and education.
- The thesis argues that economic development leads to greater similarities between countries, regardless of cultural or political differences.
Additional Information
- Implications of the Convergence Thesis
- Supports the idea that globalization and industrialization lead to economic and technological uniformity among nations.
- Explains why economic policies, work culture, and urbanization in industrialized nations are similar.
- Highlights the role of mass production, education, and industrial management in shaping societies.
- Criticism of the Convergence Thesis
- It underestimates cultural differences, which continue to shape social and economic structures.
- Not all countries follow the same development path; some maintain distinct social and political systems.
- Political ideologies and governance models can still create divergence despite economic similarities.
Where were most of the tea gardens in colonial India located?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 7 Detailed Solution
Download Solution PDFThe correct answer is - Assam
Key Points
- Tea Gardens in Assam
- The tea industry in India began in 1851, with Assam being the primary tea-producing region.
- Assam’s favorable climate, including high rainfall and fertile soil, made it ideal for large-scale tea plantations.
- By 1903, Assam’s tea industry employed approximately 4,79,000 permanent and 93,000 temporary workers.
- Reasons for Assam’s Dominance
- The region had vast uninhabited hillsides, which were converted into tea plantations.
- The British East India Company focused on Assam due to its economic potential for tea exports.
- Due to Assam’s sparse population, laborers were recruited from other Indian provinces.
- Other Tea-Producing Regions
- West Bengal: The Darjeeling hills became famous for high-quality tea.
- Tamil Nadu & Kerala: The Nilgiri Hills contributed to tea production but were secondary to Assam.
Additional Information
- Labour Recruitment Challenges
- Due to Assam’s inhospitable climate and remote location, labor shortages were a major issue.
- The British introduced the Transport of Native Labourers Act (1863), allowing contractors to recruit workers.
- Many laborers worked in harsh conditions with low wages and minimal rights.
- Impact of the Tea Industry
- Assam became a global leader in tea production, significantly contributing to the British colonial economy.
- Tea became a major export commodity for the British, strengthening their control over Indian resources.
- The industry played a key role in integrating rural Assam into national and international trade networks.
Structural Change Question 8:
What fraction of India’s landmass was under cultivation in 1600?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 8 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is 'One-sixth'.
Key Points
- One-sixth of India’s landmass was under cultivation in 1600.
- This fraction reflects the agricultural extent during the early period before large-scale expansion of farmland.
- The limited extent of cultivated land was due to the traditional methods and the socio-political landscape of the time.
- It indicates the initial stage of agricultural development in India prior to modernization and colonial interventions.
- This early agricultural land also supported various local economies and traditional lifestyles prevalent in the 1600s.
Structural Change Question 9:
What is proto-industrialization?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 9 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is rural industry.
Key Points
- Proto-industrialization is the regional development, alongside commercial agriculture, of rural handicraft production for external markets.
- It was a phase of industrialisation which was not based on the factory system.
- It was the contemporaneous agricultural growth in the 17th and 18th centuries, during the decades that preceded the Industrial Revolution.
- The proto-industrial phase was dominated by the spread of rural domestic manufacturing.
- It linked more and more families to the pulse of national and international markets.
Thus, we can say that proto-industrialisation was the rural industry.
Structural Change Question 10:
What is proto-industrialization?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 10 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is rural industry.
Key Points
- Proto-industrialization is the regional development, alongside commercial agriculture, of rural handicraft production for external markets.
- It was a phase of industrialisation which was not based on the factory system.
- It was the contemporaneous agricultural growth in the 17th and 18th centuries, during the decades that preceded the Industrial Revolution.
- The proto-industrial phase was dominated by the spread of rural domestic manufacturing.
- It linked more and more families to the pulse of national and international markets.
Thus, we can say that proto-industrialisation was the rural industry.
Structural Change Question 11:
What is proto-industrialization?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 11 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is rural industry.
Key Points
- Proto-industrialization is the regional development, alongside commercial agriculture, of rural handicraft production for external markets.
- It was a phase of industrialisation which was not based on the factory system.
- It was the contemporaneous agricultural growth in the 17th and 18th centuries, during the decades that preceded the Industrial Revolution.
- The proto-industrial phase was dominated by the spread of rural domestic manufacturing.
- It linked more and more families to the pulse of national and international markets.
Thus, we can say that proto-industrialisation was the rural industry.
Structural Change Question 12:
What is a key characteristic that distinguishes industrial societies from traditional civilizations?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 12 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is - Industrial societies rely more on inanimate power sources and machines.
Key Points
- Industrial societies are characterized by the use of machines and inanimate power sources, such as steam and electricity.
- Unlike traditional civilizations, where most labor was manual and based on human or animal power, industrial societies mechanized production.
- This shift enabled mass production, increased efficiency, and the expansion of industries like manufacturing, transportation, and communication.
- Urbanization and employment shifts
- As industrialization progressed, employment shifted away from agriculture to industries, offices, and service sectors.
- In industrial societies, the majority of the workforce is engaged in non-agricultural sectors, such as technology, finance, and commerce.
Additional Information
- Traditional civilizations
- These societies were largely agrarian, with a majority of people working in farming and handicrafts.
- Technological advancements were relatively slow, leading to a dependency on manual labor.
- Impact of Industrialization
- Industrialization led to rapid urbanization, with cities expanding to accommodate factory workers and new industries.
- It also caused significant social and economic transformations, including the decline of traditional village economies.
- Contrast with Post-Industrial Societies
- While industrial societies rely on factories and mechanized production, post-industrial societies focus on services, knowledge, and technology.
- Post-industrial economies see a rise in employment in IT, finance, healthcare, and education.
Structural Change Question 13:
Which of the following best illustrates the paradox of colonialism in India?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 13 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is - Indians lived under colonial rule while learning about western liberalism and freedom
Key Points
- Paradox of Colonialism
- Colonial rule introduced modern ideas such as liberalism and freedom while simultaneously denying these rights to Indians.
- British education policies spread Western knowledge, but political rights remained restricted.
- This contradiction led to the rise of nationalist movements that demanded self-governance.
Additional Information
- Impact on Indian Society
- Western education led to the formation of an Indian intelligentsia that played a crucial role in political awakening.
- English language became a tool for both oppression and empowerment, creating opportunities but also social divisions.
- Examples of the Colonial Paradox
- While British rule introduced modern legal systems, it denied Indians participation in governance.
- The British promoted railways and industries, but mainly to benefit their own economy.
Structural Change Question 14:
Why is the colonial experience particularly significant for understanding modern India?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 14 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is - Because it brought modern ideas and institutions, but in a contradictory manner
Key Points
- Contradictory Nature of Colonialism
- Colonialism introduced modern ideas such as democracy, liberalism, and individual rights.
- However, these ideas were not applied to Indians, as they lived under oppressive colonial rule.
- Western Influences
- India adopted British-style governance, including a parliamentary system, legal codes, and policing.
- Western education introduced ideas of equality and rights, fueling nationalist movements.
- Impact on Social and Cultural Life
- Colonialism altered traditional Indian institutions but did not completely erase them.
- It led to a mix of traditional and modern elements in Indian society, influencing urbanization and industrialization.
Additional Information
- Economic Impact
- British policies led to deindustrialization and the decline of traditional Indian industries.
- However, they also established modern industries and railways, transforming India's economic landscape.
- English Language and Education
- English became a major language in India, providing access to global knowledge but also creating social inequalities.
- It benefited some marginalized groups, like the Dalits, by offering new opportunities in education and jobs.
- Political Awakening and Nationalism
- Exposure to western political thought led to the rise of Indian nationalism and the demand for self-rule.
- Movements like the Indian National Congress and Gandhian movements were influenced by these ideas.
Structural Change Question 15:
According to historian Sumit Sarkar, what initially affected urban luxury manufactures like Dacca’s silk?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Structural Change Question 15 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is - Collapse of indigeneous court demand and external markets
Key Points
- Urban luxury manufactures like Dacca’s silk and cottons were among the finest exports of pre-colonial India.
- According to Sumit Sarkar (1983), these industries were hit first due to the simultaneous collapse of two key markets:
- Indigenous court demand – As regional kingdoms declined and princely states lost autonomy, court patronage for fine crafts diminished.
- External market – British colonial control redirected trade routes and policies to favour British manufactured goods, drastically reducing exports of Indian luxury textiles.
- This marked the beginning of deindustrialisation in eastern urban centres like Murshidabad and Dacca.
Additional Information
- Regional impact of British policies
- British penetration was earliest and deepest in eastern India, where courtly traditions were strongest, thus the decline was most visible there.
- Village crafts in interior regions survived longer but were later affected with the spread of railways and market integration.
- Shift in trade dynamics
- Under the East India Company, Manchester cloth flooded Indian markets, replacing handwoven Indian textiles.
- British export policies led to India becoming a supplier of raw materials rather than finished goods.
- Decline of artisan classes
- Craftsmen and weavers dependent on urban luxury markets either moved to subsistence agriculture or became wage labourers in emerging towns like Bombay and Madras.
- This had a long-term effect on social structures and occupational hierarchies in colonial India.