Decoding Indian Administration: Structure, Functions, and Emerging Trends!

Indian administration has a long history dating back thousands of years. Even before modern India came into existence, different kingdoms and dynasties ruled over parts of the Indian subcontinent. They had their own systems of administration, which helped them govern vast areas effectively.

UPSC IAS exam aspirants and students who have chosen Public Administration as an optional subject must give due importance to this article as it holds crucial information for their preparation.

Enroll for UPSC Coaching now.

Evolution Of Indian Administration

The history of administration in India dates back thousands of years. Since ancient times, rulers developed systems to govern vast populations and regions. As India experienced rule under different kingdoms and empires, administrative structures evolved over time.

• During the Indus Valley Civilization period, people followed a systematic town planning scheme. There is evidence of well-organized governance in Harappan cities. The Vedic society had a rudimentary administrative system with village councils and tribal chiefs.
• In the Mauryan Empire, Chandragupta Maurya implemented an efficient administrative system with a centralized bureaucracy. Emperor Ashoka expanded this system and appointed royal officers from local populations. The separation of military and civil administration helped improve governance.
• During the Gupta period, urban local self-government became prominent. Villages formed the base of rural administration with heads known as Gramakutunis. Provincial governors known as Uparikas were appointed by the Emperor to collect taxes and oversee law and order.
• The Mughal Empire saw the further refinement of administration. Emperor Akbar instituted local self-government through panchayats. Nobles known as Mansabdars formed the backbone of the imperial administrative system. Districts were divided into sub-districts called Parganas which were headed by officers.
• The British adopted elements of the earlier Mughal system. The Charter Act of 1853 separated the civil and military administration. The British assigned higher civil service posts to British officers and lower posts to Indians. District collectors were made the head of a district's civil administration.
• The 1919 Montagu-Chelmsford reforms introduced the concept of dyarchy, whereby some ministries came under elected Indian ministers, whereas others remained under British control. It widened the participation of Indians in administration. The Government of India Act 1935 made the provinces fully responsible for their respective legislative assemblies.
• After independence, the Indian Constitution divided administrative powers between the union and state governments. The IAS and other All-India services were set up to provide a professional civil service. The provision of local self-governance through panchayats and municipalities was also made.
• Since then, the Indian administrative system has undergone many changes. The government has set up new institutions and ministries for economic planning and socio-economic development. The Panchayati Raj system was revitalized in the 1990s to decentralize governance.
• Technology has also transformed administration in recent decades. Digital initiatives like e-governance, online services, and Aadhaar enabled the government to deliver services effectively. Transparency and accountability were improved through the Right to Information Act and social audits.
• However, challenges remain due to India's large population, socio-economic diversity, and resource constraints. Problems persist in implementation and effective service delivery at the grassroots level. Corruption, red tape, and absenteeism of government staff are issues that need to be tackled.
• Experts recommend continuing reforms to make the administration more performance-oriented, citizen-centric, and transparent. There are also calls for more decentralization and devolution of powers to local bodies. The civil services need to become more professional and accountable.
• As India moves towards becoming a global economic power, the need for a dynamic, efficient, and technologically advanced administrative system will become more important. If we learn from the successes and failures of history, India has the potential to establish world-class governance in the future. But this requires strong political will, the participation of citizens, and ongoing experimentation and reforms.

Ancient Administration

The ancient roots of Indian administration can be traced back to the Indus Valley Civilization, as evidenced by recent excavations at Harappa and Mohenjodaro. The discoveries reveal well-planned cities with structured roads, efficient drainage systems, and uniform housing. Additionally, the civilization exhibited a standardized system of weights and measurements, along with a common script, indicating the presence of a substantial kingdom in the region.

Administration During Vedic Period

• Rig Veda Period:
  • Administrative units: kull, gram, vesh, and nation.
  • Vedic king ruled with popular bodies: samiti and sabha.
  • Samiti meant assembly; king's attendance was crucial.
  • Sabha served as the national judicature.
• Duties of the King:
  • Main duty: defense of the people.
  • Head of the army: senani.
  • Head of the village: gramini.
  • King assisted by ministers, with the chief known as purohit.
• Ramayana and Mahabharata Periods:
  • Ramayana period: Monarchical government.
    • Head: King overseeing people's welfare.
    • Advisors: Ministers and councilors.
  • Mahabharata period: Continued monarchy.
    • King responsible for people's welfare.
    • Council of ministers and officers in place.

Post - Vedic Period Administration

• Buddha's Period:
  • Republics and Mahajanpadas coexisted.
  • Four major kingdoms: Magadha, Avanti, Vats, Kaushal.
  • Republics governed by sabhas, where power was shared among elites and commoners.
  • Republic's head elected for a fixed term, accountable to the council or sabha.
• Arthashastra of Kautilya:
  • Valuable source on public administration in ancient India.
  • King central to the state, appointing and removing officers.
  • Officers acted on king's commands, accountable for their functions.
  • Justice administered in the king's name; royal edicts had legislative force.
  • King, supreme commander of military forces, importance to espionage.
  • Kautilya, Prime Minister of Chandragupta Maurya, unified the country.
• Council of Ministers:
  • 18 high functionaries, including yuvraj, minister, purohit, senapati.
  • Consulted on important matters; advised king in their respective domains.
• Provincial Administration:
  • Empire divided into provinces, governed by appointed governors.
  • Provinces further subdivided into regions and districts for administration, revenue, and law and order.
  • Regions further divided into villages, headed by gopas, equivalent to present-day patwaris or lekhpals.
  • Distant provinces communicated with the central government through an inspection staff.
• Mauryan Municipal Government:
  • Well-organized municipal government.
  • Cities divided into wards for better administration.

Medieval Administration

This classification encompasses three categories of administration based on distinct historical periods: (a) Administration during the Rajput period, (b) Administration during the Sultanate period, and (c) Administration during the Mughal period.

During Rajput Period

• The predominant form of government in this era was monarchy.
• A council of ministers assisted the king in governance.
• The state was divided into smaller units, with prant being the largest.
• The Rajput government combined militarism, feudalism, and divine-right monarchy.
• Rulers prioritized military glory over public welfare.
• Respect for rulers existed, but not affection or gratitude.
• Brahmins and Kshatriyas typically held civil and military positions.
• This led to apathy among the rest of the population toward political matters.
• Non-interference in local administration fostered local initiative, efficiency, and self-reliance.

During Sultanate Period 

• The Sultanate period (1206-1525) commenced with the defeat of Rajput king Prithviraj Chauhan in 1192.
• Muhammad of Ghor and Qutubuddin Aibek played key roles in establishing the Sultanate in 1206.
• The period lasted until the defeat of the last Afghan King, Ibrahim Lodhi, in 1526 at the hands of Mughal founder Babar.
• Notable rulers during the Sultanate period included Illtutmish, Balban, Alauddin Khilji, and Muhammad Bin Tughlak.
• The period saw the rule of Slave (1206-1290), Khilji (1290-1320), Tughlak (1320-1414), Saiyyad (1414-1451), and Lodhi (1451-1526) dynasties.

During Mughal Period

• The Mughal dynasty in India began with Babar's victory at the Battle of Panipat in 1526.
• Babar's death in December 1530 led to his son Humayun inheriting the throne, facing initial challenges.
• After continuous battles, Humayun recovered his kingdom but died in 1556, succeeded by his son Akbar.
• Akbar, victorious in the second Battle of Panipat in 1556, is considered the true founder of the Mughal dynasty.
• The first four Mughal emperors, including Akbar, Jahangir, Shah Jahan, and Aurangzeb, were notable rulers.
• Aurangzeb's death in 1707 marked the beginning of the Mughal Empire's decline, leading to its disintegration in 1770.
• The later Mughal emperors were less powerful, eventually succumbing to the British East India Company.
• In 1858, the last Mughal king, Bahadur Shah Zafar, was dethroned and exiled by the British.

During British Period

• The present administrative system in India originated during the East India Company's rule.
• This period is divided into two parts: East India Company's rule up to 1857 and British government rule from 1858 to 1947.
• The East India Company initially came to India for business but later took control of the country's government.
• Company rule ended in 1858, and the British Crown assumed governance.
• These are crucial evolutionary steps in India's administrative history.
• After Aurangzeb's death in 1707, the Mughal empire began to disintegrate, leading to paralyzed central administration.
• Minor rulers, once under Mughal suzerainty, started fighting among themselves, allowing the East India Company to establish control.
• The Battle of Plassey in 1757 played a significant role in consolidating authority in the hands of the company.

Features Of Indian Administration

The administrative system of India has some unique features that distinguish it from other countries. These features have evolved over centuries and reflect India's diverse history, culture, and complex challenges. Some of the main characteristics of Indian administration are as follows:

• Federal structure: India has a federal structure with powers distributed between the union government and the state governments. Each state has its own elected government, legislature, high court, and administrative mechanisms. This federal structure helps accommodate India's diversity and ensures some autonomy for states.
• Separation of powers: The Constitution separates powers among the legislature, executive, and judiciary. The parliament makes laws, the executive implements them, and the judiciary interprets these laws. This system of checks and balances ensures no single institution can exercise absolute powers.
• Civil service based on merit: The civil services in India are merit-based, and selection is made through a highly competitive pan-India exam. Every year lakhs of candidates appear for the civil service exams. Officers are allotted cadres based on their preferences and merit. This ensures talent spreads across all states.
• All India services: India has the unique feature of All India services like IAS, IPS, and IFS, whose officers serve both the union and state governments. These services provide a steady workforce of professionally trained officers who can be transferred across the country.
• Role of collectors: The role of district collectors is a legacy of the British system. Collectors are in charge of maintaining law and order, collecting revenue, and implementing development programs in a district. They have enormous powers within their jurisdictions.
• The rule of law: India follows the principle of the rule of law, where everybody is treated equally under the law. The Constitution is the supreme law, and all authorities function within its framework. The judiciary acts as a watchdog to ensure the executive functions as per the law.
• Democratic setup: India is a democratic republic where all adult citizens can vote to elect their representatives. Elections are held regularly at different levels. An independent election commission conducts free and fair elections. People's participation in governance is ensured through elections.
• Planned economic development: India follows the mixed economy model where both private and public sectors co-exist. Since independence, the government has focused on planning economic development through the mechanism of five-year plans. Various targets are set, and policies are framed to achieve these goals.
• Welfare orientation: The Indian Constitution promises justice, liberty, equality, and welfare for all citizens. The government provides a welfare safety net through numerous schemes for poverty alleviation, education, healthcare, and social security. However, the implementation of welfare schemes has been uneven.
• Federal character: Efforts are made to maintain the federal and secular character of the administration. The allocation of civil service posts across states and the representation of different social groups ensure the administrative apparatus has an all-India character.
• Local self-governance: The Constitution envisages a system of local self-governance through panchayats and municipalities. Regular elections are held for these bodies. However, local bodies need to be strengthened to become more effective institutions of people's participation.
• In summary, the key features of the Indian administration are its federal and democratic structure, rule-bound civil services, provision of local governance, and a mix of both welfare and developmental orientations. While these features enable India to function as a large and diverse democratic nation, constant improvements are needed to realize the full potential of India's administrative system. More decentralization, use of technology, and emphasis on administrative reforms can help make the system more citizen-centric and responsive to the needs of a fast-changing India.

Conclusion

With continuous improvements and innovation, the Indian administration aims to become a role model for developing nations. If we can make the system work effectively for all sections of society, we can achieve higher economic growth and social development. A responsive and efficient administrative system is necessary for India to realize its full potential as a global power.

Download the Testbook App today for a seamless learning journey!